Comparison between stylet and bougie with the C-MAC D-blade in cervical simulated immobility. A prospective randomized controlled trial

Introduction: The C-MAC D-blade was designed for difficult airway intubation scenarios. To facilitate easier and faster endotracheal in the laryngoscopy paradox, an introducer is preferred. Hence, we decided to conduct a study compare 60˚ angled stylet gum elastic bougie as aids while using laryngoscope simulated setting. Objective: ease of oral with use (60˚ stylet) versus performed over inserted guidance patients restricted cervical mobility. Methods: Prospective, randomized controlled single-center study. Intubation 48 surgical randomly assigned 2 groups 24 each: Stylet group, Group S (using Bougie B bougie) after providing manual in-line stabilization restrict Mann-Whitney U test Chi square were used applicable. Results: resulted (Group 75% vs. 16.7%) 26.83 ± 8.61s 47.18 16.46s) fewer attempts compared group B. Both experienced similar hemodynamic stress response intubation. Conclusions: more effective time-saving aid bougie.